Clozapine-Related Myocarditis and Rechallenge: A Case Series and Clinical Review.

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: That clozapine is the only agent with an indication for treatment-resistant schizophrenia presents real challenges if clozapine-related myocarditis (CIM) occurs. Clinicians have chosen to rechallenge with a second trial of clozapine in the face of CIM. However, there is very limited literature of this topic. METHODS/PROCEDURES: Three cases who underwent clozapine rechallenge after CIM are reviewed and discussed in the context of existing literature and current recommendations. FINDINGS/RESULTS: We present 3 young male patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder who developed CIM during a first clozapine trial, stopped treatment, and subsequently underwent a second clozapine trial. In all cases, the rechallenge was discontinued owing to suspected CIM. A review of the literature includes reports of both successful and unsuccessful clozapine rechallenges after CIM and suggests certain risk factors. Clozapine rechallenge after CIM may be undertaken, as now occurs on occasion with agranulocytosis, although rates of success may be lower. Any such undertaking calls for education, careful monitoring, cautious titration, and a multidisciplinary approach. The balance of risk versus benefits must be considered, and strategies may include a drug holiday, more frequent monitoring upon reinitiation, and slower titration. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Pressure to undertake a rechallenge reflects clozapine's unique role in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and absence of other comparable options. However, it is not without risk, and more research is needed to understand those at increased risk, as well as established strategies that diminish this.

Patient versus rater evaluation of symptom severity in treatment resistant schizophrenia receiving clozapine.

Patient input as part of health care has taken on increased importance recently. To look at whether patients with treatment resistant schizophrenia (TRS) are able to provide a valid self-assessment of symptoms, the present study investigated patient versus rater evaluation of clinical symptoms. Ninety-three patients diagnosed with TRS and treated with clozapine were recruited. Both patients and raters completed the 7-point Clinical Global Impression - Schizophrenia Version (CGI-SCH) scale, thereby providing evaluations for positive, negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms as well as overall illness severity. Patients rated their clinical symptoms significantly lower than raters. A positive correlation was found between patients and raters for all symptom domains, while the strength of correlation varied. Age, gender and years of education did not impact the relationship between patient and rater scores. The conclusion is that patients provided valid information in self-assessments of symptoms when compared to raters, and this was consistent over time. In addition, the greatest heterogeneity between rater and patient ratings occurred with regard to cognitive symptoms. Patient assessments may help further engage individuals in their care and permit clinicians to identify where discrepancies exist. Addressing these issues offers opportunities for improved therapeutic alliance, education, and shared decision-making within treatment.